The article critically evaluates recent political claims that El Salvador holds gold reserves worth USD 3 trillion and examines proposed alternatives to cyanide (thiosulfate, gravity methods, bioleaching) for gold extraction. It argues that reserve claims are implausible in light of global datasets and that, despite toxicity concerns, cyanide remains the only widely viable lixiviant for modern industrial-scale gold production.

Global Context vs. National Claims

Using U.S. Geological Survey and World Gold Council figures, the author notes that total global gold reserves are valued at under USD 5 trillion. Therefore, attributing USD 3 trillion (≈60% of the world’s total) to El Salvador—whose land area is ~0.014% of Earth’s continental surface—is inconsistent with available data. Historic national output was small (e.g., tens to low hundreds of kilograms in the late 1990s), further weakening assertions about an exceptionally high deposit density.

Current Estimated Gold Reserves in the world

Cyanide’s Role in Modern Gold Extraction

Since its adoption in 1889, cyanide leaching has enabled profitable recovery from low-grade ores (often <1 g/t). Today, cyanidation is applied to nearly all industrial gold extraction at some stage due to its effectiveness, selectivity, recyclability in circuit, and established downstream recovery (carbon adsorption/elution or Merrill–Crowe zinc cementation). Nonetheless, cyanide’s acute toxicity demands strict management to mitigate risks to wildlife, water, and communities.

Assessment of Proposed Alternatives

Conclusions Specific to El Salvador


Note: This page summarizes the original article without adding or removing subjects beyond the author’s scope. For detailed figures, tables, and citations, refer to the source document.